Gov. Greg Abbott signaled a policy shift Tuesday, announcing his support for banning intoxicating hemp products just weeks after vetoing a proposed statewide ban. While his previous stance called for regulating the industry similarly to alcohol, Abbott now says only non-intoxicating hemp with limited THC content should remain legal, setting the stage for renewed legislative battles over the future of cannabis-derived products in Texas.
Abbott clarified his position in multiple interviews, stating he wants to preserve access to non-intoxicating hemp while outlawing those that cause a psychoactive “high.” Specifically, he’s calling for a cap of 3 milligrams of THC per gram of product, effectively targeting Delta-8 and other synthetically-derived cannabinoids currently unregulated under state law. These compounds have gained popularity in Texas due to their availability and ability to bypass the 0.3% Delta-9 THC cap already in place.
“The only hemp product that’s going to be out there is non-intoxicating hemp, which is below 3 milligrams of THC,” Abbott said. He also emphasized that Delta-9 THC products should be limited to adults 21 and older, positioning his proposal as one that protects both public health and personal liberty. “We’re going to be protecting the lives of those under 21 and we’re going to protect the liberty of those who are 21 and older,” he stated, as reported by the Austin American-Statesman.
Abbott’s revised stance came as a Texas Senate committee reviewed a version of Senate Bill 3, the same legislation he vetoed in June under pressure from Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, who has pushed for an outright ban of all THC products.
Industry stakeholders responded with cautious optimism. Jake Bullock, CEO of THC beverage company Cann, noted that a focus on banning synthetics while allowing low-dose natural THC could preserve product availability and consumer choice. Advocates like Heather Fazio of the Texas Cannabis Policy Center welcomed Abbott’s engagement, saying it offers a path to balance “liberty and responsibility” in shaping a hemp policy that reflects both market realities and public safety concerns.
