Dr. Margaret Carpenter was facing attacks from Texas’ law system, until a clerk in New York decided to stop the file intended for a Texas judge at $ 100,000.
“While I’m not entirely sure how things work in Texas, here in New York, a rejection means the matter is closed,” stated Ulster County Clerk Taylor Bruck, who previously rejected in March an initial request to file the judgement. Following, a second demand was made by the Texas attorney general’s office, claiming Bruck has a “statutory duty” to make the filing under New York civil practice law.
New York is known for being one of the eight states that protect providers from other states’ reach, in spite of abortion opponents claiming this violates a constitutional requirement of states respecting the laws and legal judgments of other states. Now, Texas State Attorney General wants a New York court to enforce the decision made by Texas against Dr. Carpenter for allegedly prescribing abortion medication via telemedicine.
Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul invoked the state’s shield law in rejecting a request to extradite Carpenter to Louisiana, where the Dr. is accused of prescribing abortion pills to a minor. In response to the latest request made again by Paxton’s office, Houchul had said that Paxton was attempting to dictate “the personal decisions of women across America.”
“I’ll never back down from this fight,” she said.
The ongoing standoff between Texas officials and New York authorities underscores the deepening national divide over abortion rights and enforcement across state lines. As legal efforts to pursue Dr. Carpenter continue, New York’s shield laws and officials remain firm in their resistance, signaling a broader clash between states with opposing laws on reproductive healthcare.
The outcome may set significant legal precedent, testing the limits of interstate authority in a post-Roe America.
